Access4IT
Eminent Member
Topics: 5 / Replies: 26
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Do i need to disable these?

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Hello, It doesn’t matter which setting i make in the config (InternalRoutingOn: False/True) Allways getting as shown in the picture. OOF messages are …

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Jacob, When turning InternalRoutingOn to True and set the scoping on my send connector to the same as the config RoutingDomain still getting the inter…

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Is it correct when setting InternalRoutingOn to True that internal Out of Office are send again to internal tenants

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Jacob, It works now!! Great…Internal Out of Office is dropped. Is it possible that the external is send out?

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: RouteBySender

I guess that it is possible to set a smarthost later through ECP?

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Jacob, The only setting i changed : <add key=”RoutingDomain” value=”*” />

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Jacob, I’m on 2016 CU 10 on Windows Server 2016.I also unblocked the zip file, but did this after your post and getting the same error.It is not possi…

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

Jacob, I bought the RouteBySender but getting an Error (see picture) Knipsel.PNG

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

In a “DAG” setup, do I need This product on every server?

6 years ago
Forum
Reply
Answer to: RouteBySender

I thought that it was the same….sorry. Is it possible to have a demo of your product?

6 years ago
Forum
Topic
6 years ago
Forum
Replies: 20
Views: 11653
Reply
Answer to: Delete / edit company error

Jacob, The version was 3.1…. and we updated to 3.1.1536 and that resolved the issue for us. Because the first 3 letters of the new company are CON t…

7 years ago
Forum
Topic
Forum
Replies: 1
Views: 5733
Reply
Answer to: HELO reply is internal servername

It’s working now! Thanks for the tip, but the actual solution was smtp inspection within our firewall (Cisco ASA)

8 years ago
Forum
Page 1 / 3